From grayzeck@astro.umd.edu Fri Jan  2 14:35:37 2004
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:06:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Ed Grayzeck <grayzeck@astro.umd.edu>
To: stefmcl@astro.umd.edu
Subject: corrections to the comet2003 review pages ; see Anne's email; two items

Stef, I attach the following two items that need correction on the web page for 
comets2003...

ed

>From raugh@astro.umd.edu  Mon Dec 22 08:14:01 2003
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:14:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Anne Raugh <raugh@astro.umd.edu>
To: grayzeck@astro.umd.edu
Subject: Re: two questions for Mon; needed reproposal info

> You said Monday was question day.  I have two questions.   For
> the meeting notes you compiled for the review, I got response from 
> external participants to change two items.   How do you want
> this handled?   Give it to Stephanie, give it to you?   and as
> an outline of the specific correction?   I have one for Wed and one
> for Thur?

If Stephanie is going to oversee lien resolution, she might as well handle 
this.  The individual lien lists and my meeting notes are here:

  /n/sbn/review/comets2003/NOTES

I would suggest saving the original comments you received in a new file in 
that directory ("feedback" or something like that) in case we want to reference
them later.  Then make the specific changes requested in the ".liens" files
for the data sets affected.  It would be a good idea to delete and re-create
the "liens.zip" file afterwards, to keep it consistent (it just contains the
entire directory contents).  I don't think there are any web changes required
for this, unless you want to indicate in the "index.html" file the specific
data sets that had their lien lists updated.

-Anne.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stef,

Here are the two items.  On Wednesday notes, there should be a corrections
to a point listed under SDCIDA_0001 (Scheeres):

under calexmpl.pdf, the fourth item should read as foolows:
Need to specify the procedure to find Hydrogen and Silver spectral peaks.

There should be an addition to an item under SDNC_0001, namely, item 8
which currently reqads TB notes there are keyword issues.   Change to
"New keywords that need definition and ingestion into the PSDD follow:
EMEJ2000_SC_QUATERNION, SATURATED_PIXEL_COUNT,SCAN_MIRROR_ANGLE,
SCAN_MIRROR_RATE,SCAN_MIRROR_TEMPERATURE."


Then for Thursday, there is a typo under DSIDS_0001

change the acronymn "pdw" to "pws" so it reads pws_cal_approach document.
this same filename occurs in item 6 and needs to be corrected.

_____________________________________________________________________
Can you follow Anne's suggestion in the attached email

ed