compared to previous versions that I reviewed for Launch and Jupiter, the
documentation and data was much improved

here I discuss calibrated Cruise 1 data, but many issues should apply also 
to other datasets

aareadme.txt, voldesc.cat list that data are from 6/2007-1/2015, which 
cannot be right

the first two lines in nh.cat, nhsc.cat and sdc.cat should not be there

the header in aareadme.txt says "NH SDC JUPITER Calibrated VERSION 2.0", 
while this is Cruise 1 version 1. The same issue shows up in dataset.cat 
in catalog/, which also lists updates for V2.0.

the header in aareadme.txt says "The NH SDC interplanetary cruise 
Calibrated VERSION 2.0", while this is version 1

what is the relation between CRUISE and CRUISE 1, mentioned in different 
parts of the documentation? If different, relation between the two should 
be explained

It should be defined somewhere in the document what speed was used to 
convert charge to mass (perhaps I did not find it). The ecliptic velocity 
of the spacecraft is given in document/nh_trajectory.tab, but this table 
ends on 2007-01-21, and does not cover Cruise 1.

text in each directory appears either above the list of subdirectories or 
below, which is confusing. I'd prefer to have subdirectories listed first 
followed by the text. The web page could say that the following text is 
the content of file named X.

I liked content of files nh.cat, nhsc.cat and sdc.cat that give a brief 
introduction about the mission and instrument. These files can be 
highlighted in aareadme.txt as something that the reader can read first 
for a brief intro.

Volume contents in aareadme.txt says that nh_trajectory.lbl is a 
Jupiter-relative trajectory, but this files also contains ecliptic 
coordinates and velocity, and if extended in time (see above), it can be 
quite useful for working with this archive. (Sure, the trajectory can be 
obtained from http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?horizons)

nh_met2utc.*, which is a conversion table between spacecraft MET and UTC 
should be extended in time (it goes only up to 2007-08-15)

I like samples directory and its purpose.

aareadme.txt or sdc.cat could briefly explain the difference between raw 
and calibrated data, just to give enough context for the user, so that one 
can decide which one to use (Sure, calibration is described in Horanyi et 
al., as mentioned in sdc.cat)

The change from keplerian to relative velocity is huge, right? I'd suggest 
to put warning that calibrated V1.0 data form Jupiter (and Launch) should 
not be used because they assume incorrect speed.

Update a phrase in dataset.cat that says "that a new calibration curve 
will be submitted for publication in Spring, 2009.

dataset.cat includes the same text twice (e.g., sections version, updates,

dust.cat missing in catalog/

In sdc.cat, the description claims that: "When a dust particle impacts on 
the detector, it randomly aligns some of these previously organized 
molecules." Is that correct? Should not it be "randomly mis-aligns"? 
Please check.

I was able to read .fits files, and they look good.