SBN Comets Review, 5 Mar 2013 (sam: Saved Comets201303_Notes.docx as plain text.) On Telecon: Ken Klaasen Don Lindler Richard Chen Brian Carcich Present: Mike A’Hearn Stephanie McLaughlin Tom Duxbury Mike Kelley Jade Williams Ludmilla Kolokolova Mike Smith Matthew Knight Tony Farnham Jian-Yang Li Anne Raugh (recording) Lori Feag (joined late) DIF-C-MRI-5-EPOXI-HARTLEY2-PHOTOM-V1.0 ======================================= o Typos submitted separately by Matthew. Result: Certified DIF-C-HRIV-5-EPOXI-HARTLEY2-DECONV-V1.0 ======================================= o Add information about the deconvolution algorithm to documentation (see Jian-Yang’s presentation) o Add some guidance about the differences between the images – so a user could tell which might be appropriate for various uses (see Jian-Yang’s presentation) o Replace null value of “-88.88” in deconv_image_parameters.tab with a flag value that is out of range, like “-999”. Tony Farnham and Jian-Yang Li have already calculated the actual values. If possible add them to the table rather than leaving them null. Note in the label the origin of the values added. o In deconv_image_parameters.tab, column 33 definition of “partial saturated pixel” is not clear. o The /DATA/ section is repeated in the AAREADME.TXT file. o Typos to be submitted separately. Result: Certified DIF-C-HRII-3/4-EPOXI-HARTLEY2-V2.0 ================================== o In the documentation, emphasize which temperatures are critical for calibration (Mike DiSanti and Lori Feaga will work the details). o Enhance the description of the IR flat field in its label. Result: Certified. [Note: SBN will verify that the wavelength map really does show the “smile” prior to public release.] [Additional: This has already been verified.] DIF-C-HRIV/ITS/MRI-5-TEMPEL1-SHAPE-V2.0 ================================== o Add definition of “mean radius” to dataset.cat o Jian-Yang’s presentation page 7 lists a number of typo-type problems in the dataset.cat that should be corrected. o The Cartesian version (needed by the VRML) appears to be a noticeable degradation of the planetocentric version of the shape model. Tony F. will re-create the Cartesian version to improve the translation. The documents related to this will need to be corrected to reflect the new derivation in the Cartesian version. o See Jian-Yang’s presentation slides 12-14 contain a laundry list of minor documentation corrections and improvements. o If it’s available, Tom Duxbury requested addition information about how the shape model was made. Result: Not Certified. Certification dependent upon internal review and acceptance of new Cartesian version. DIF-C-HRIV/MRI-5-HARTLEY2-SHAPE-V1.0 ==================================== o Jian-Yang’s presentation includes a number of minor documentation issues on pages 16, 20. o The Cartesian version degradation found in the Tempel 1 model appears here as well, and should be similarly corrected and documented. o The general liens for the Tempel 1 shape model also apply to this data set. Recommendation: SPICE PC kernel parameters don’t agree with the dataset.cat description of the axes and rotation. It probably should. Result: Not Certified. Certification dependent upon internal review and acceptance of new Cartesian version. EAR-C-COMPIL-4-UNIDENT-V1.0 ==================================== o Need to know things like resolving power of instruments. o Would like to know many unidentified lines were observed. o It looks like there are values missing from the table that were known to be in the papers. For example, time of observation was recorded in Anita’s deVico paper. o The difference between “line strength” and “brightness” needs to be clearly defined, and there should be units associated with both these values. o Need a table covering which wavelength were observed for each comet. This file would also serve as a useful index of comets included in the data set. o The dataset.cat does not look like it was completed prior to submission! Result: Rejected. Please edit and re-submit. SBN will provide guidance. RO-A-OSINAC/OSIWAC-5-LUTETIA-SHAPE-V1.0 ======================================= o The dataset.cat has a typo in the radius of the third axis – should be 75, not 175 km o “plate_shape_definition.asc” refers to the wrong object (Tempel 1, not Lutetia). o Include additional information about how the model was created (see Tom’s slide 5). o Need a better definition of how “center” is defined/selected. o See Jian-Yang’s presentation for a short list of minor documentation corrections (slide 22). o If possible, add quality flags to the facet table. Result: Certified RO-A-OSINAC/OSIWAC-5-STEINS-SHAPE-V1.0 ====================================== o The actual coordinate system is not specified in the dataset.cat. o “plate_shape_definition.asc” refers to the wrong object (Tempel 1, not Steins). o Need a better definition of how “center” is defined/selected. o Jian-Yang’s presentation slide 24 has a list of minor documentation issues. o If possible, add flags to the facet table to indicate which are from direct observation and which from lightcurves. Result: Certified DIF-M-HRIV-3/4-EPOXI-MARS-V2.0 DIF-M-MRI-3/4-EPOXI-MARS-V2.0 =============================== o Typos submitted by email Result: Certified. DIF-E-HRIV-3/4-EPOXI-EARTH-V2.0 DIF-E-MRI-3/4-EPOXI-EARTH-V2.0 =============================== o Add or point to the known geometric information that is “UNK” in the labels, from the labels. o Carolyn Crowe has published a paper about this data set which should probably be added to the reference list (it’s mentioned in Matthew’s typo list). o Typos submitted by email. Result: Certified. The end.