11 Feb  2013, from T. Farnham:


These are questions that have been sent to Laurent Jorda, the creator of the
shape model.  We have yet to gat a reply, but they are changes that are
likely to be incorporated during lien resolution.


In the Steins paper (Jorda et al 2012), there is a discrepancy in the pole
orientation.  The abstract gives and orientation RA=99, Dec=-59, while the
text of the paper give RA=91, Dec=-62. It is not clear which of these is correct.

Second, the Steins model has a discontinuity between the one side and
the other (there appears to be jump in
radius that skirts the body).  This probably delineates the regions
where the Rosetta flyby data constrained things, and where the lightcurves
were the primary constraint, but we'd like confirmation of this.

We'd like to include the illumination and viewpoints for the approach,
closest approach and departure views, but do not yet have the geometry.  This
is in addition to the 6 primary axis views, which are included.