Below are the liens for the following NH SDC data sets:
    NH-J-SDC-2-JUPITER-V3.0
    NH-J-SDC-3-JUPITER-V3.0
    NH-X-SDC-2-LAUNCH-V3.0
    NH-X-SDC-2-PLUTOCRUISE-V1.0
    NH-X-SDC-3-LAUNCH-V3.0
    NH-X-SDC-3-PLUTOCRUISE-V1.0

o In the various documents we see SDC, VSDC, and VB-SDC all to refer to the 
  same instrument - pick one.  I prefer SDC, which is used most of the time 
  (including the literature paper), none of the variants occur on the acronym 
  list.

o Emily has found one raw file that does not have a calibrated equivalent.
  She will supply the name and this will be investigated.  This is in 
  the Pluto cruise data. nh-x-sdc-2-plutocruise-v1.0/data/20100723_017143/sdc_0171435128_0x700_eng_1.*

file: 'catalog/sdc.cat'
--> In sdc.cat, in Operational Considerations Item 4) regarding the lack of observation of "large particles", please replace "large" with an actual threshhold number.

file: 'document/soc_inst_icd*.pdf'
--> On page 118 under Section 13.1.1 it says that Channel 11 failed before launch.  On Page 119 under Section 13.2.1 it says that Channel 10 has an electrical issue.  Other documentation makes it clear it is Channel 11 that has the issue.
--> The first paragraph in section 13.3.1.1 repeats the previous paragraph. 
--> The last paragraph in section 13.3.1.1. cites a 2007 paper as being "in pub".  We should have the updated citation here.
--> Section 13.4.2 shows the Dataflow Block Diagram.  The lower green rectangle should say "Conversion of Charge to Mass" instead of repeating the upper green rectangle.

file: 'errata.txt'
--> The statement in the errata.txt file should be in the dataset.cat CONFIDENCE_LEVEL_NOTE and in the sdc.cat "Operational Considerations" list.  The errata.txt file should die.
   
 Last updated: 2015-01-08, SBN:T.Barnes