Liens List from New Horizons P3 June 2017 review for:
    NH-P-LORRI-2-PLUTO-V3.0
    NH-P-LORRI-3-PLUTO-V3.0

- Inconsistancy: PI change is mentioned in dataset.cat and lorri.cat, but is not updated in all relevant document files, such as aareadme.txt, document/aareadme.txt.

- Difference between V2 and V3 in level-3 data is 53 images has relative difference >1e-3, which seems to be due to fix of missing data and improved calibration.

- Difference between V2 and V3 in level 3 data, there are 1735 images different, but mostly just small diff in a few 1000s pixels different.

- "lor_0299078508_0x639_sci" this image appears to be out of focus 

- All index directories and files need to be checked for selection errors in the slim indices, and column labeling errors in all index files. 

file: 'nh-p-lorri-2-pluto-v3.0/catalog/dataset.cat'
--> These targets are referred to here, but EN has no TARGET.CAT for it
    TARGET_NAME = "HD 205905"
    TARGET_NAME = "HD 37962"

file: 'data/*/*.lbl'
--> Many target names are different (not necessarily spelling) between FITS header and PDS label.  For example "SPICA" or "VEGA" vs "STAR".  Please use the actual name.
-->--> Note that the PDS-SBN would prefer that use 'SPICA' or 'RHO LEO' instead of 'STAR'.  Any well known star target should be spelled out and not use the generic STAR target. 
--> The TARGET_NAME values are not the approved versions. Cases below:
    --> "1994 JR1" => "15810 ARAWN (1994 JR1)"
    --> "CHIRON" => "2060 CHIRON"
    --> "IXION" => "28978 IXION (2001 KX76)"
    --> "JJ124" => "2010 JJ124"
    --> "MS4" => "ASTEROID 307261 (2002 MS4)"
    --> "QUAOAR" => "50000 QUAOAR (2002 LM60)"
--> Resolve things like "STAR" or "CALIBRATION" to the actual target name if known and provided.
--> Confirm TARGET_NAME values.  I noticed some odd changes between the 2017-04-27 and 2017-05-05 deliveries.  For example "JR1" to "IXION" in 'nh-p-lorri-2-pluto-v3.0/data/20160714_033078/lor_0330783728_0x633_eng.lbl' or "JR1" to "CHIRON" in 'nh-p-lorri-2-pluto-v3.0/data/20160714_033079/lor_0330792188_0x633_eng.lbl'.  This is a completely different target.

file: 'index/index.lbl'
--> File breaks down after column 11 for accurately describing the index table.

file: 'index/*ind*.tab'
--> File contains TARGET_NAME values that are not listed in the data label.  For example: 'data/20160715_033091/ali_0330918179_0x4b2_eng.lbl' states "STAR", but in the PDS index and FITS header it states "SPICA".
--> Note that PDS-SBN would prefer to use the name found in the index and FITS header over the generic ones currently present in the PDS data label.

file: 'catalog/dataset.cat'
--> All TARGET_NAMEs found in the 'data/' directory should be found within this file.  Currently there appears to be a mix up with target_name values in the data labels.  Please resolve and confirm this list.  Also note that "N/A" should be removed from this list and never included when you have other valid targets listed.
--> Note that if "HD 205905" and "HD 37962" are valid values for TARGET_NAME, that we will need to add them to the PDSDD.
--> In the ABSTRACT_DESC it mentions that this data set includes the first set of KBO objects, but it should really say TNO objects.  There are zero KBO objects in this data set.
--> In the draft V2.0 of the data set, the ABSTRACT_DESC mentioned the JR1 observations being included (which at that time was incorrect).  But now that they are included, shouldn't it be mentioned now?  There is a sizable amount of data products that look at this target.

file: conard_spie.lbl
--> "A draft preprint of CONARDETL2005" error in this sentence need to be corrected.

file: 'document/nh_mission_trajectory.lbl'
--> "The following summarize of the comma-separated table column:" Need to rephrase that sentence.
--> Missing "et al"