Participants:

Tilden
Gerbs
Ludmilla
Boris Semenov
Richard Chen
Chuck Acton
Maud Barthelemy
Bjorn Grieger
Randy Kirk
Olivier Barnouin


Note summary:

Olivier Barnouin

What is the average precision and accuracy of the model?  Add this to the *_info.asc documents.

Changes over time representative?

Randy: which model to use and when?  above information would be good to include to help decide this.

Need to state if the spice kernels will line up with each model.
--> Bjorn is in the process of producing some of these updated spice kernels.

Boris:  Are these models going to be reproducable?

Barnouin:  How to place X picture onto Y model?  That is what we want to know if this is doable.

What readjustments need to be made?  Are they recorded?  If so where? If not, just stating that should be fine.

All this should be in the user doc.




RAndy Kirk review

See presentation


Bjorn review

There appears to be a difference in one part of the shap5 vs shap4s models.  An 'overhang'  slides <=160.

note slide 161

esa model tends to have varying resolution, whereas the spc has rather uniform  slie 165-~175

elevations differences slide 180

slide 185:  some docs are not referenced

barnoiun:  above tables are good to show differences

randy:  there appears to be a rotation spc/mscp models appears rotated.  dlr and moc is consistant

Lien: verify the preview images match the models.  Regenerate.







Boris review

C5-11: Clarify which reference frame is being used for each model.  If it was produced in a different frame and then transformed to cheops frame?


Boris: The rotation parameters are not time bound.  Please clarify when they are appclibable.



CERTIFIED, with minor liens.  Check the dsks and verify the rotation and reference frames.