EPOXI MRI-VIS 103/Hartley 2 Encounter Photometry Collection
Minor Comments/Typos
by Matthew Knight
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Overview.txt
-Does not explain differences with respect to version 1
-Does not mention "Anomalous behavior of MRI document"
-Should there be names/references for the dataset(s) from which these
 data are derived?
-Lines 95, 98: "\226" instead of "-"
-same lines: is mu an acceptable ASCII character?
-Line 120: "brightness if" -> "brightness is"
-Lines 128, 129: more Word to ASCII problems

epoxi_photometry_V4.pdf
-p.5: Lines 5-6 of section 3.5 say "We do not recommend using apertures
with a radius smaller than 3 pixels for photometry" but Fig 2 plots
photometry in a 2 pixel radius.
-p.7, line 3: "brightness if" -> "brightness is"
-p.7, line 4: I believe the units for CN images should be "microns" not "mm"
-p.7, Section 3.7, paragraph 2, line 2: Should "VC" be "UC"?
-p.7, last paragraph: the first line says "shot" noise, but it is
referred to as "photon counting noise" elsewhere in the paragraph. Assuming
these are interchangeable, it's probably better to be consistent,
especially since "PC" seems to be used for this noise term.
-p.8, paragraph starting "1.", line 3: N_PC is not defined.
-p.8, line after first equation: I believe the units in flux should be
"micron" not "um"
-p.8, line after second equation: Is the radiometic calibration constant (R)
given in another dataset? Should this be referenced?
-p.9, line 3: I believe the units in flux should be "micron" not "um"
-p.9 table: the unit for columns 4-5 should say "Pixels" (plural) for
 consistency
-p.10 table: The comment for column 12 should say singular "comet"