Produced by PDS-SBN: T. Barnes

===============================================
Datasets Validated:
    RO-C-OSINAC-2-ESC1-67PCHURYUMOV-M12-V2.1
    RO-C-OSINAC-4-ESC1-67PCHURYUMOV-M12-V1.0
    RO-C-OSIWAC-3-ESC1-67PCHURYUMOV-M12-V2.1
    RO-C-OSINAC-3-ESC1-67PCHURYUMOV-M12-V2.1
    RO-C-OSIWAC-2-ESC1-67PCHURYUMOV-M12-V2.1
    RO-C-OSIWAC-4-ESC1-67PCHURYUMOV-M12-V1.0


===============================================
Errors for:    GLOBAL (all datasets)

file: 'CALIB/CALINFO.TXT'
--> There is no talk of the OSICALLIOPE_V##.TXT files.

files: 'CALIB/OSICALLIOPE_V*.TXT'
--> There is no DESCRIPTION for the DOCUMENT object.  It would be very useful to add.

file: 'CATALOG/DATASET.CAT'
--> DATA_SET_DESC: The ABSTRACT_DESC is more descriptive of this data set is a few respects (calibration type, data units, target(s)) than here, which should never be the case.  Please add more details.
--> DATA_SET_DESC: The 'Related Datasets' section lists many data sets that do no exist, nor will exist to the archive.  (Note they were separate samples sent to PSA/PDS for internal review purposes only).
--> DATA_SET_DESC: The 'Change log' section mentions the including of '.fts' files, but they are actually '.FIT' files.  

file: 'CATALOG/REFERENCE.CAT'
--> This file needs to be updated to the most current version.  

files: 'DOCUMENT/*/*.LBL'
--> Strongly suggest adding an informative DESCRIPTION keyword to each DOCUMENT object to describe what the document is.  Since the DOCUMENT_NAME is the file name (as opposed to the name/title of the document as suggested in the PDSDD), there is little clue beyond the file name and the DOCUMENT_TOPIC_TYPE to know what the document is.

files: 'DOCUMENT/*/*.PDF'
--> The following documents claim to be PDF/A-1A (generated by Microsoft Office?), but fail verification.  (The others succeed)
--> --> CALIB/ADC_CORRECTION_V01.PDF
--> --> CALIB/EXPOSURETIME_COR_V03.PDF
--> --> CALIB/GEOMETRIC_DIST_COR_V02.PDF
--> --> CALIB/GEO_PRODUCTS_V01.PDF
--> --> CALIB/RADIOMETRIC_CALIB_V02.PDF
--> --> CALIB/SOLAR_STRAYLIGHT_V01.PDF
--> --> EAICD/OSIRIS_EAICD_V03.PDF
--> --> EAICD/OSIRIS_EAICD_V04.PDF
--> --> SCIENCE_USER_GUIDE/SCIENCE_USER_GUIDE_V01.PDF
--> --> SIS/OSIRIS_SIS_V02.PDF
--> --> SIS/OSIRIS_SIS_V03.PDF

file: 'ERRATA.TXT'
--> The ERRATA warns that the FIRST_LINE and FIRST_LINE_SAMPLE can be negative values.  I found none such in these data sets.  Is this still relevant for the OSIRIS data set?


===============================================
Errors only for:    *-4-* (all L4 datasets)

files: 'BROWSE/*.LBL'
--> The AZIMUTH_FOV and ELEVATION_FOV keywords unit should be changed from "DEGREES" to "deg" (as has been done with level 2 and 3 data sets).
--> The ROSETTA:HORIZONTAL_RESOLUTION and ROSETTA:VERTICAL_RESOLUTION keywords unit should be changed from "RAD" to "rad" (as has been done with level 2 and 3 data sets).

[ERROR] files: 'CATALOG/DATASET.CAT'
--> DATA_SET_NAME: Since it is known that there will be multiple L4 data sets per phase and sub-instrument, please make sure this value is unique.  All level 4 names are exactly the same as those provided in other L4 samples not provided in this review.  There should be a difference.
--> ABSTRACT_DESC: The "(CODMAC level 4)" is out of place in the sentence.  Perhaps rephrasing the ABSTRACT to say "This CODMAC level 4 (resampled) data set contains ...".  Similar situation for the L5 data set.
--> CITATION_DESC: The DAT_SET_NAME part has the same problem as the DATA_SET_NAME keyword.

[ERROR] files: 'DATA/*/*.LBL'
--> The AZIMUTH_FOV and ELEVATION_FOV keywords unit should be changed from "DEGREES" to "deg" (as has been done with level 2 and 3 data sets).
--> The ROSETTA:HORIZONTAL_RESOLUTION and ROSETTA:VERTICAL_RESOLUTION keywords unit should be changed from "RAD" to "rad" (as has been done with level 2 and 3 data sets).