Created by SBN:T.Barnes for the Rosetta RPCLAP data sets.

===============================================
Datasets Validated:
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-ESC1-DERIV2-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-ESC1-NEL-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-ESC2-DERIV2-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-ESC2-NEL-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-ESC3-DERIV2-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-ESC3-NEL-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-ESC4-DERIV2-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-ESC4-NEL-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-EXT1-DERIV2-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-EXT1-NEL-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-EXT2-DERIV2-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-EXT2-NEL-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-EXT3-DERIV2-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-EXT3-NEL-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-PRL-DERIV2-V1.0
	RO-C-RPCLAP-5-PRL-NEL-V1.0
	

===============================================
Errors for: 	GLOABL (all datasets)

file: 'CALIB/*_CALIB_FRQ_*'
--> The TXT files should actually have an ASC extension.  TXT files have an attached PDS label and ASC files have a detached PDS label.
--> Why are these TXT files not in separate table files?  The data would need to be slightly reformatted and then the label would need to define multiple tables.

file: 'CATALOG/DATASET.CAT'
--> ABSTRACT_DESC: For the NEL data sets, it says that it contains "plasma density at higher time resolution than in the DERIV2 data sets."  
--> DATA_SET_DESC: For the NEL data sets, in section B, I would make clear that this is different from the DERIV2 data sets, similar as in the ABSTRACT_DESC.  If possible it might be even better to specify what the higher time resolution is.
--> CITATION_DESC: The data set description/name part is not unique between the NEL and DERIV2 data sets.  Please fix.

file: 'DOCUMENT/RO-IRFU-LAP-UG.PDF'
--> This file claims to be PDF/A-1B compliant, but it fails standards verification.  Please make this file compliant. 

file: '*DERIVED2*/INDEX/BROWSE_INDEX.LBL'
--> BROWSE_INDEX_TABLE: does not contain required element INDEX_TYPE.  Please include.

file: 'VOLDESC.CAT'
--> DESCRIPTION/VOLUME_NAME: Best to differentiate between the NEL and DERVIVED2 data sets in both of these keywords.