Comments by SBN:T.Barnes for the 2022-10-18 peer review. =============================================== NOTE: =============================================== Datasets Validated: urn:nasa:pds:nh_derived::1.0 urn:nasa:pds:nh_derived:lorri_cob::1.0 =============================================== Errors for: GLOBAL (all datasets) files: 'bundle.xml' --> The NH investigation context object is included, but the NH/KEM1 investigation context object is not included (but is in the process of being created), but it appears that it should be included since a lot of the data is from the mission. file: 'lorri_cob/collection.xml' --> Reminder for SBN or provider to provide DOI information in this file for the collection. --> Since the NH LORRI calibrated data products were used to produce the this data, we should probably add an external reference to it. If we have specific data products to cite per these derived products there should be a way to do that as well. --> I noticed that in the investigation area, it is listed as "none". Is this correct? files: 'lorri_cob/data/*.xml' --> The mentions: The file name gives the UTC date and time that the data was taken, in the form YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sss, where T stands for "time." I'm not sure that this text is appropriate or helpful. --> --> Ditto for --> I noticed that in the investigation area, it is listed as "none". Is this correct? file: 'lorri_cob/overview.txt' --> The first paragraph has the text forced wrapped to new lines, but the second paragraph doesn't. I suggest to be consistant one way or the other. file: 'lorri_cob/overview.xml' --> The is duplication of the text in the TXT file, and really does not apply to this file. This is an overview document, not the collection itself. file: 'lorri_cob/document/nature_preprint.pdfa.xml' --> I think we should provided an external reference to the published version of this paper. Page 25 provides the "How to cite this article", and I believe the DOI is 10.1038/ncomms15003 and the publication year is 2017, not 2015 as mentioned on page 25 of this pre-print. The pre-print DOI is https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.02989 --> --> If this paper is important to understanding the data, should it be added as an external reference in the collection.xml file?