Internal review of Lucy L'LORRI 3I/ATLAS data by SBN:Tilden Barnes

===============================================
NOTE:

===============================================
Datasets Validated:
	urn:nasa:pds:lucy.llorri::4.0
	urn:nasa:pds:lucy.llorri:data_3i_atlas_partially_processed::1.0
	urn:nasa:pds:lucy.llorri:data_3i_atlas_raw::1.0


===============================================
Errors for:	L'LORRI

Need updated Lucy LDD to take into account of a new value for the lucy:mission_segment keyword: "3I/ATLAS" 
--> Don't forget to update the Lucy LDD version referenced in every label, since currently it points to the copy that does not contain 3I/ATLAS as a mission_segment.

files: 'data_3i_atlas_*/collection.xml'
--> Ask to drop "Collection" from the Identification_Area.title.
--> Is the "3I/ATLAS" a mission phase or a mission segment?  If the latter, please update the Citation_Information.description.

files: 'data_3i_atlas_*/collection_overview.xml' 
--> All cases of "3I/Atlas" should be changed to "3I/ATLAS" since "ATLAS" is an acronym.  Identification_Area.title, Identification_Area.Citation_Information.description, Document.document_name, and Document.description
--> There is a standards question that has arisen for the use of reserved names.  Recommend renaming all collection_overview* to simply overview* since "collection" is reserved for the collection product.

files: 'data_3i_atlas_*/overview.txt'
--> Did Lucy do a "Flyby" of 3I/ATLAS?  If not, please update the first sentence in the Data Set Overview section of this document.  Perhaps a better phrase would be "remote observations" or just "observations" or "target of opportunity" as stated in the bundle's readme.txt file.
--> For the partially_processed document, the Data Products section describes the data as "Raw images" that have not had instrument artifacts removed.  This appears to be a copy paste issue using the raw paragraph instead of the partially processed paragraph as found in the prior mission phases.